Skip to main content

Principles of Movie Heists

Rule #1: Use your characters for their character traits.
a) What can each character do? If there’s a lock to be picked, give it to the lockpick.

b) What will and won’t the character choose to do, given that character’s personality? If you need someone to take out the guards, don’t give that job to the pacifist.

Corollary: A heist can be used so the audience can understand a character.
In these cases, demonstrate character the way you would demonstrate character in any other scene. Don’t let the heisting get in the way of demonstrating character, but don’t let demonstrating character get in the way of the heist.
Above all else, never let anything get in the way of story.

--

Rule #2: If the heist is not in-and-of-itself the plot, make sure the heist affects the plot in some way.

a) Just like in any other sequence, the more ways a heist sequence affects the plot, the better.
A heist could simply help the characters get the MacGuffin (the interchangeable thing the plot revolves around), but it could also reveal character, cause conflict between characters, set up future pay-offs, introduce new characters, etc.

b) Just like in any other sequence, if a heist sequence doesn’t actually affect the plot, consider removing it.

--

Rule #3: Each heist is essentially made up of 2 phases that each break down into 3 parts.
Phase 1: Before the Heist. This consists of:
Part 1: Obstacle Exposition, where we learn why this heist is difficult to pull off.
Part 2: Explaining the Plan, where we learn how these characters plan to pull of the heist.
Part 3: Preparation, where we watch the characters preparing for the heist, including getting materials and rehearsing.

Phase 2: The Heist Itself
Part 1: Infiltration, where the characters get inside the place where the MacGuffin is kept
Part 2: Acquisition, where the characters actually get the MacGuffin once they’re in
Part 3: Getaway, where the characters get the MacGuffin and themselves to a secure location.

a) The audience generally expects that a heist will allocate its time as follows (these are rough approximations):
Obstacle Exposition: 5%
Explaining the Plan: 5%
Preparation: 25%
Infiltration: 50%
Acquisition: <1%
Getaway: 15%

b) Spending a different amount of time than the audience expects on a given part will subvert the audience’s expectations.

c) Emphasizing one specific part to the point of effectively eliminating the other parts will subvert the entire genre of heist movies.

c) Changing a part of this structure will subvert the audience’s expectations.

--

Rule #4: The more the audience knows about a plan, the less likely it is to succeed. The less the audience knows about the plan, the more likely it is to succeed

a) If the plan is explained as we see the plan being pulled off, throw Rule #4 out the window.

--

Rule #5: A heist’s quality (not to be confused with the quality of a scene in which a heist is shown) is expressed in how well each part of the heist contributes to the heist.
This is not a rule of writing. This is a rule of planning a heist for Masterminds, but the writer needs to understand the plan better than the Mastermind.

a) Every time the Mastermind plans for a character to sneak around, that should contribute to the heist.

b) Every time the Mastermind plans for a character to get exposed, that should contribute to the plan.

c) Every moment that either doesn’t contribute to the heist or hinders the heist, the audience gets the idea that the Mastermind's plan isn't foolproof.

d) The more highly the audience thinks of the Mastermind, the more parts of the heist should contribute to the heist. Otherwise, the Mastermind is set up to be excellent at his job, but the audience never gets to see him be excellent at his job.

--

Rule #6: Every person involved in the heist is a liability, and thus must be essential to the heist.

a) In a heist, a character needs to be essential to the heist, not just the plot.
A character who exists only to add dramatic tension or comic relief can be included in many parts of the story, but in a high-stakes situation like a heist, the characters who don’t contribute to the heist need to stay out of the heist sequence.

b) If 2 characters in a heist can be combined, do so.

--

Rule #7: Decide on the impressive scenes everyone will remember, then choose obstacles that make the necessity of those scenes so clear that you don’t need to fill in too many plot holes.

--

Rule #8: The audience only cares about the parts of the heist that are either difficult, or cool, or compelling. The other parts need to be referenced or shown so that the audience understands how the heist worked, but they don’t need to be focused on.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Age of Ultron as a Hawkeye Movie

We sometimes say that Tony is the ultimate antagonist of the MCU. We sometimes say that Avengers: Age of Ultron is a movie more about Hawkeye than any other character. But it turns out: You could rewrite Age of Ultron in a way that takes out Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat and you would have effectively the same movie. The plot of Avengers: Age of Ultron  is pretty simple: When Tony Stark gets manipulated into creating a robot to protect the planet that goes awry, the rest of the Avengers try to stop the robot from destroying the earth. Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat don't actually help  Ultron or the Avengers to succeed in their goals. So let's re-imagine Age of Ultron  as a solo Hawkeye movie. In this version, Hawkeye becomes the main character, and b ecause of their traumatic experiences involving Stark, Wanda and Lame Quicksilver are still villains. Tony is rewritten as an obvious villain, giving us 4 major villains:  Tony, Wanda, Lame Quicksilver, and Ultron, ...

I Don't Want The Current X-Men Multiverse To Fit In The MCU

Why don't I want the current X-Men multiverse in the MCU? I don't want the X-Men of the current X-Men multiverse to be fit into the MCU. The MCU has had seamless continuity the whole time (except for that one time). The X-Men multiverse has had such bad continuity that they created an entire movie to fix the continuity, and they STILL managed to throw in more continuity snags. The MCU has had more good films than bad films. The X-Men multiverse has had more bad films than good films. Avengers: Infinity War already has too many characters. X-Men: The Last Stand had too many characters. An Avengers/X-Men crossover is just BEGGING to have no emphasis on any given character. And frankly, I'm ready for the X-Men movies to be done. X-Men: Days of Future Past - The Rogue Cut  was both an excellent movie and an excellent resolution to the series. I'm emotionally resolved enough that I want the series to be done there. Not because the series is bad - but because The Rogue Cu...

Thoughts and Prayers Aren't What You Think

We each occasionally hear people giving other people a hard time for sending thoughts and prayers to the people involved in a tragedy. Sitting around feeling sorry for someone else won't do any good any more than sitting around feeling sorry for yourself. And when someone says that they're sending "thoughts and prayers" when they're really just sitting around feeling sorry for someone, they're not actually sending thoughts and prayers. When they're just going abou t their normal lives and not thinking about or praying for the victims of tragedy, that is obviously not sending thoughts and prayers. But when someone is actually sending thoughts and prayers, that is a wonderful and essential part of helping people overcome both personal and public tragedy. Prophets and Apostles have clarified for decades that true prayer requires acting on our prayers, not just wishing that God would do it all for us (Sources may include David A. Bednar's April 2006 Confer...