Skip to main content

Fantastic Beasts Proposed Titles

I'm genuinely disappointed that the sequel to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is officially titled Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald.
JKR had already established a wonderful pattern: that each prequel movie set in the Wizarding World could be named after a textbook.
Instead, the name of the franchise is now Fantastic Beasts, leaving us with 2 problems:
1) "Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" is simply too long (it's so long that I copied and pasted it that time). We usually abbreviate it Fantastic Beasts, but that doesn't mean Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (copied and pasted again) anymore. That name refers to the franchise as a whole. It's a similar problem to when Star Wars got retitled Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope. Years later, people still hear Star Wars and don't know if it's talking about the franchise or the film. Hopefully, people will start calling Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (copied and pasted for the 3rd time because the title is just so long) "Fantastic Beasts 1".
2) If the franchise is called Fantastic Beasts, that implies that the franchise (not just the first movie) will have something to do with magical animals, not just wizards. The name of the franchise usually has something to do with the content in the franchise. Take a look at Harry Potter, Star Wars, Star Trek, The Lord of the Rings, and The Terminator. I seriously doubt the Fantastic Beasts franchise as a whole will be about magical animals, but it's entirely possible. If it isn't, it will really confuse the normal people who watch Fantastic Beasts 3 at a friend's house for movie night and wonder "Where are the beasts?"

Better naming schemes for this 5-part series might include:

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Fantastic Beasts and How to Hunt Them
Fantastic Beasts and How to Train Them
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Sell Them
Fantastic Beasts and How to Identify Them
This has the benefit of tying the series together and tying the series together with the Harry Potter series, like the naming system "Harry Potter and the ____" did.
But it has the detriment of limiting the franchise to having something to do with the beasts.

(My personal favorite naming scheme:)
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
The Life and Lies of Albus Dumbledore
Quidditch Through the Ages
The Standard Book of Spells
A History of Magic
This has the benefit of being flexible enough to deal with anything from Quidditch to history to Dumbledore, and fits with several plot points we already know, including Dumbledore's and Grindelwald's involvement in the second installment. Best of all, it follows the pattern set by Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (copied for the 4th time in this post).

I'm just glad the series is not titled:
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Fan2stic Beasts
Fantastic 3sts
Fant4stic Beasts (pronounced "fant-FOUR-stick")
5tastic Beasts (pronounced "five-TAS-tick")
This has the benefit of telling you the order the movies go in, because let's be honest: When you give something a title like Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince and you mention "Harry Potter 6" to someone who doesn't know the series very well, they don't know which one that is.
The problem is: If the title doesn't give you any plot information, how are you going to remember which one had which event?
An actor was once quizzed on the events of a franchise he played in. A scene was described in vivid detail. All he had to do say which film had that scene. The problem is: the films were only denoted by their number: I, II, III, IV, V, and VI. He got about half the scenes wrong and had to basically guess on all of them.
Which Fast and Furious movie had the giant safe rolling down the road? The title Fast Five doesn't answer that question, even though that's essentially the plot of the entire movie.
Even vague plot information isn't good enough. Does Tom Cruise's character hang off the edge of a building in Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol, Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation, or Mission: Impossible - Fallout? That's the most prominent scene of the movie, but you wouldn't know which one it is from the title, because the title only gives you extremely vague plot information that you only understand after watching the movie. It's almost a Word Salad Title (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WordSaladTitle), and that doesn't help us know which movie we're watching.
Of course, we don't want every movie to be Exactly What It Says on the Tin (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ExactlyWhatItSaysOnTheTin), but having a little bit of plot information that we can easily retain would be really nice, just so we know which movie is which.
But as long as they're calling the second one by such a clumsy title, I'm using this naming system.

In case you're curious, my favorite naming system is the one from the original Star Trek films. The naming system goes like this:
Franchise Title [number]: Subtitle
I say the one from Star Trek because I'd like that subtitle to have to do with the general plot like The Search for Spock, The Curse of the Black Pearl, or The Winter Soldier. Not to be seemingly random words like Reloaded, Beyond, or Salvation. And not to be words that only indirectly talk about the plot or only talk about a scene or two like Ragnarok, The Phantom Menace, or At World's End.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Age of Ultron as a Hawkeye Movie

We sometimes say that Tony is the ultimate antagonist of the MCU. We sometimes say that Avengers: Age of Ultron is a movie more about Hawkeye than any other character. But it turns out: You could rewrite Age of Ultron in a way that takes out Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat and you would have effectively the same movie. The plot of Avengers: Age of Ultron  is pretty simple: When Tony Stark gets manipulated into creating a robot to protect the planet that goes awry, the rest of the Avengers try to stop the robot from destroying the earth. Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat don't actually help  Ultron or the Avengers to succeed in their goals. So let's re-imagine Age of Ultron  as a solo Hawkeye movie. In this version, Hawkeye becomes the main character, and b ecause of their traumatic experiences involving Stark, Wanda and Lame Quicksilver are still villains. Tony is rewritten as an obvious villain, giving us 4 major villains:  Tony, Wanda, Lame Quicksilver, and Ultron, ...

I Don't Want The Current X-Men Multiverse To Fit In The MCU

Why don't I want the current X-Men multiverse in the MCU? I don't want the X-Men of the current X-Men multiverse to be fit into the MCU. The MCU has had seamless continuity the whole time (except for that one time). The X-Men multiverse has had such bad continuity that they created an entire movie to fix the continuity, and they STILL managed to throw in more continuity snags. The MCU has had more good films than bad films. The X-Men multiverse has had more bad films than good films. Avengers: Infinity War already has too many characters. X-Men: The Last Stand had too many characters. An Avengers/X-Men crossover is just BEGGING to have no emphasis on any given character. And frankly, I'm ready for the X-Men movies to be done. X-Men: Days of Future Past - The Rogue Cut  was both an excellent movie and an excellent resolution to the series. I'm emotionally resolved enough that I want the series to be done there. Not because the series is bad - but because The Rogue Cu...

Thoughts and Prayers Aren't What You Think

We each occasionally hear people giving other people a hard time for sending thoughts and prayers to the people involved in a tragedy. Sitting around feeling sorry for someone else won't do any good any more than sitting around feeling sorry for yourself. And when someone says that they're sending "thoughts and prayers" when they're really just sitting around feeling sorry for someone, they're not actually sending thoughts and prayers. When they're just going abou t their normal lives and not thinking about or praying for the victims of tragedy, that is obviously not sending thoughts and prayers. But when someone is actually sending thoughts and prayers, that is a wonderful and essential part of helping people overcome both personal and public tragedy. Prophets and Apostles have clarified for decades that true prayer requires acting on our prayers, not just wishing that God would do it all for us (Sources may include David A. Bednar's April 2006 Confer...