Skip to main content

Fan Theory: Rules of Toy Story

Some people may be wondering about the more intricate parts of the rules of Toy Story. Here's what I can gather. This is not canon, this is just what I can logically deduce. Please do not take this as official or as the actual rules of Toy Story.

How do toys become sentient? How do they leave their delusions?
In TS1, see only 1 fully-delusional toy: Buzz.
In TS3, we only see one character experience Buzz's delusional state: Buzz, but only because he gets turned to Demo mode (that will become important).
TS2 gives us plenty of material to learn about delusional toys:
All of the new toys - Zurg, New Buzz, even Tour Guide Barbie - are completely "in character".
We can assume that New Buzz and Zurg are still on Demo mode since they just got out of their boxes. With that fact and the fact that Buzz completely forgot about his Demo Mode time and his Spanish Mode time once he got set back to Play (TS3), we can assume that all toys that have a Demo mode are delusional until their owners put them on Play mode.
What of toys that don't have a switch from Demo to Play? We don't see Tour Guide Barbie leave her Tour Guide delusion, but the Toy Soldiers and the LGMs are still in their delusions to one degree or another, while other toys like Weezy, Hamm, and Trixie have already left their delusions, but are able to enter fantasylands in order to please their owners.
We don't have any confirmation of what causes a toy without a switch to leave their delusions, but we can draw a vague correlation: Toys that their owners put in fantasy scenarios in which the toy is an active character who has willpower generally become more sentient. The LGMs and Tour Guide Barbie have never been played with, so it makes sense that they wouldn't understand the Toy Story universe and would still live in their delusions. And the Toy Soldiers have only been treated as passive characters in Andy's fantasies.
We do know that simply existing in the Toy Story universe doesn't gradually cause a toy that has a Play-Demo switch to stop being delusional, since Buzz doesn't learn his nature as a toy, no matter how much wandering around the Tri-City area he does.
I'm not saying that's how it is. I'm saying that might be how it is.


What makes a toy forget their delusional period? After all, Buzz remembers being delusional, but nobody else seems to remember.
When Buzz learns the hard way that he's a toy, he remembers everything before learning the hard way. (We know this because he knows that New Buzz will act like he's suffocating if he loses his helmet in TS2.)
But when Buzz gets switched to Play mode, he loses his memory of being in Demo mode or Spanish mode (TS3).
If other toys learned some way other than the hard way (through gradual play, through a "Play" switch, etc.), they might forget completely about their delusional periods.
Also, we only know the age of a toy if we know when it first leaves its box. We know generally how old Buzz, Mrs. Potato Head, New Buzz, Tour Guide Barbie, and others are, but for all we know, Woody was probably alive and owned before Sputnik (1957, assuming the same history applies to their universe as ours). We see a computer that has an Instant Messenger program in TS3, so we can guess Woody has been alive for at least 45 years. He may have forgotten his delusional stage from having so many memories in his head. In fact, any toy may be so old, it may have forgotten its delusional stage from simply having so many memories that it had to jettison the earliest ones.
We know nothing about toy psychology or toy neurology, so please don't take this as fact.

While a toy is still delusional, what kind of family* structures are available for that toy?
There is only one piece of evidence in the 3 films** of families for delusional toys: Zurg telling New Buzz "I am your father" (TS2).
This doesn't say anything about families structures for toys in the Toy Story universe, but it is safe to say that there is a concept of fatherhood and children in the Star Command universe (like the Buzz Lightyear of Star Command movie and TV show).
What we don't know is: Is New Buzz actually Zurg's son, or is New Buzz's character in his delusion the son of Zurg's character in his delusion? And are all Buzz's the sons of all Zurgs?

Once a toy stops being delusional, what kind of family structures are available for that toy? Mr. Potato Head reminds himself "I'm a married spud" (TS2) and gets jealous when Mrs. Potato Head flirts with a male toy with large muscles (TS3), so there is definitely a concept of marriage for non-delusional toys.
We don't see how they got married or when, nor do we know if any non-delusional toys ever have children.
It may be safe to assume that Mrs. Potato Head and Mr. Potato Head were married as soon as they were both open and owned by the same person simply because of their kind of toys. For non-delusional toys, marriage may be simply a social concept taken from the humans, since there's no evidence of a legal or biological concept of "family". Ironically, the toys humans play with may be "playing human" or "playing house" when they get married - playing the roles of a married couple without having a way to legally get married or even knowing that marriage needs to be legally binding.

Perhaps you have ideas on the rules of the Toy Story universe. I'd love to hear your thoughts.

-----

*For the purposes of answering this question, let's use Dictionary.com's 4th definition: "any group of persons closely related by blood, as parents, children, uncles, aunts, and cousins". I recognize families can be more complicated like having step-siblings, half-siblings, and divorces, but the purpose of this definition is to distinguish a legally-binding family from a group of close-knit people like the "family" on Fast & Furious so that we can answer questions like "Do they have kids?" and "Do they get married?"

**I don't know whether any of the tie-in shorts, films, or TV shows are canon, so for now, let's stick with just the 3 films being canon.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should The Book of Mormon Be A Movie?

Over the last few years, my brother and I have been brainstorming about how to make an epic movie (or series of movies) out of The Book of Mormon. We didn't want something simple. We want something epic - a grand adventure for the ages, like we sometimes say the Book of Mormon itself is. I've heard a lot of people love the idea, and I've heard a lot of concerns. I'd like to address some of the concerns and see if I can help. Perhaps you could help me address my major concern with making the Book of Mormon into a movie. If you have any more concerns, let me know. I'd love to discuss them. Concern #1: "It would be rated R." This is the single most frequent concern I hear. I even heard this from someone who played in the Bible videos. To be fair, it's a legitimate concern. There are plenty of lots of R-rated ancient war movies - from Gladiator  (2000), to 300  (2006) to the extended edition of The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies  (2014/2015). Th...

Age of Ultron as a Hawkeye Movie

We sometimes say that Tony is the ultimate antagonist of the MCU. We sometimes say that Avengers: Age of Ultron is a movie more about Hawkeye than any other character. But it turns out: You could rewrite Age of Ultron in a way that takes out Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat and you would have effectively the same movie. The plot of Avengers: Age of Ultron  is pretty simple: When Tony Stark gets manipulated into creating a robot to protect the planet that goes awry, the rest of the Avengers try to stop the robot from destroying the earth. Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat don't actually help  Ultron or the Avengers to succeed in their goals. So let's re-imagine Age of Ultron  as a solo Hawkeye movie. In this version, Hawkeye becomes the main character, and b ecause of their traumatic experiences involving Stark, Wanda and Lame Quicksilver are still villains. Tony is rewritten as an obvious villain, giving us 4 major villains:  Tony, Wanda, Lame Quicksilver, and Ultron, ...

Chloe Bennet? Please?

Every time I see anything about Avengers: Infinity War , I feel bogged down, even though I should be really excited for it. I finally realized the reason: No Chloe Bennet. At this point, all I care about with the MCU is what the official title of Spider-Man: The Winter Formal will be (because what else do you call the sequel to Homecoming ?), what new genres they'll explore, and how they'll have the TV shows will affect the movies. Chloe Bennet's character from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. would be a fantastic addition to Avengers: Infinity  War . Her character is powerful enough to be helpful to the team, is from a show people already like, and is extremely easy to introduce to an audience that has never seen Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D . I would love to see Chloe Bennet in a Marvel movie. (The fact that she's extremely attractive doesn't hurt.)