Skip to main content

Cap Shouldn't Have Dropped His Shield

Am I the only person who thinks Cap shouldn't have dropped his shield at the end of Captain America: Civil War?

Here's how I always picture the conversation going:

Tony: "That shield doesn't belong to you."
[me: "Uh... yes it does. It was given to him. That's how exchange of property works."]
Tony: "You don't deserve it."
[me: "Uh... yes, he does. He uses his shield to fight terrorists and protect his best friend from being murdered by Starks for crimes he didn't commit of his own free will."]
Tony: "My father made that shield."
[me: "He made it specifically for Cap."]
Tony: "You've been a jerk to me!"
[me: "That's rich, coming from you. Now Cap should go home WITH his shield and his best friend, then write you a reverse-break-up letter. Hope you get a best friend soon... or at least a surrogate son. Wait... Cap? Why are you dropping the shield! Pick up that shield! We all know you're going to have another one the next movie where we see you. So you pick that shield up right now young man.]

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sexual Misconduct

Sexual misconduct is inappropriate no matter who you are. I don't care how rich or powerful you are, and I don't care how good of a movie you made, you don't have license to engage in sexual misconduct. I do think a fair trial is necessary for sex offenders before punishing them with anything, including being fired. Not because I don't believe the accusers, but because a fair trial is necessary for every crime, and this should be treated as an actual crime, not as something taboo that at best ge ts you fired or gets you 3 months in prison as a warning to others. Are there some flaws in a fair trial? Yes. A jury might declare a guilty person to be innocent or declare an innocent person to be guilty. A fair trial might give too light a sentence, though I'm not sure I would consider that a fair trial. But I think it would frequently give people the punishment they deserve instead of the slap on the wrist and publicity they too frequently get.

Can't The News Be Better Entertainment?

You know, if news media is just going to be fiction for the sake of entertainment, views, and discussion, I wish it would do a little better with character development and worldbuilding. Also, if the writers aren't going to have strong enough characters to make them unique, I wish they would cut out a few of the more redundant characters. I'm just glad they only have one President character at a time.

Avengers on Trial

The Sokovia Accords were (supposedly) because of the Avengers' rampant property damage and third-degree murder. Shouldn't a trial have come first? A trial that involved the appearance of at least one legal representative of the Avengers, each member of the Avengers, and witnesses? How would that trial have gone if it had happened during Civil War and the Sokovia Accords hadn't happened yet? Here are my guesses. Hawkeye would get off almost completely. He caused the least property damage, killed no humans, and while he might be charged with assault, he could get off with a temporary insanity plea since he was mind-controlled or in self-defense during each instance of assault. He'd probably get even less of a penalty since he's not an active member of the Avengers after Sokovia. He'd probably get a $10,000 fine for property damage. Assuming the UN still bothers to try Banner after the events of Infinity War (when Banner finally gets back to earth)...