Skip to main content

Why DO People Eat In Movies?

The CW Flash TV show had an excellent point - Barry Allen has to eat a lot to run as fast or as far as he can. They even show what kind of food Barry eats to get that many calories.
That's a form of deconstruction we usually don't see in movies. Movie characters don't usually eat onscreen, and when someone points out that a character has to eat, it almost feels out of place. I'd forgotten just as much as the main character in The Devil Is A Part-Timer that the main character needs to eat food, so I was surprised when he passed out in the pilot from lack of food.
The Martian took that deconstruction 5 steps further by making a significant part of the plot about answer the question "How does the main character eat?"

We could ask "Why don't characters eat in so many movies?", but the answer is simple and rather disappointing. To take Hitchcock's quote out of context, "because it's dull". After all, quoting Hitchcock again, "drama is life without the dull parts". The characters can eat during the 23 hours of the day when they don't have a camera on them.

So my question is "Why do characters eat in movies?" Because let's be honest, watching someone eat is pretty dull. It's dull enough that we still don't have a TLC show where we watch people eat. So when characters do eat in movies, why do they eat when we see them onscreen?

Purpose #1: Move the plot forward.
Need a character poisoned? Time for food.
Need Jean Valjean to have a reason to steal? Time for food.
Need a character to turn into a talking llama? Yup. Definitely time for food.

Purpose #2: Strikingly demonstrate character by having him or her eat in an inappropriate situation.
When a character eats in an inappropriate situation, it tells us that character cares more about his or her own appetite than about engaging in the situation or respecting the people he or she is around.
Remember how often Tony Stark eats? Especially in the middle of conversations?
Remember when cherry tomato dripped down Denethor's chin while thousands of his men died in battle?
Remember when Kirk takes a bite of an apple during the Test scene in Star Trek (2009)? He's cares so little about the Test that all he's thinking is "I'm hungry".
A more personal example: I tend to eat in the car. What does that say about my character? I'm too busy to sit down and actually eat a meal.

Purpose #3: Show what a character is like when he's normal by having him or her eat in a normal situation.
Eating is a perfectly normal thing for people to do, so it gives plenty of opportunities for characters to do what they normally do around certain people.
The Incredibles has a wonderful scene at dinner where we get to see the family dynamic when they're just being themselves around the family.
When Hodgson recruits Nedry to steal the eggs on Jurassic Park, they're eating at a local shop, so Nedry is at ease enough to be condescending towards his employer and elated over the Barbasol.
Groundhog Day probably has the best example, because each time Phil eats at the diner, he shows what his new "normal" is, whether he's changed to become hedonistic, or whether he's changed to become sincere, or whether he's changed to become a "god".

Purpose #4: Juxtapose the normal-ness of eating with an unusual plot point.
When a character needs poisoned, we don't just give him food to hide the poison. We give him food because food is so normal that we don't expect someone to die in the middle of eating.
So, break-up scene? Food would make this feel a little more shocking.
Sniper bullet hits a main character? Food would make that feel a little more shocking by showing how unexpected it really is.

End-of-the-world scene? Food would definitely show how shocking this is! The end of the world while I'm still taking a bite. That was half the premise of Seth Rogen's comedy This Is The End: The end of the world happens - and all the characters are in the middle of a party.

People don't usually eat in any movie. But when they do, it's important. Watch for how it progresses the plot, shows character, or juxtaposes the shocking nature of what's about to come.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should The Book of Mormon Be A Movie?

Over the last few years, my brother and I have been brainstorming about how to make an epic movie (or series of movies) out of The Book of Mormon. We didn't want something simple. We want something epic - a grand adventure for the ages, like we sometimes say the Book of Mormon itself is. I've heard a lot of people love the idea, and I've heard a lot of concerns. I'd like to address some of the concerns and see if I can help. Perhaps you could help me address my major concern with making the Book of Mormon into a movie. If you have any more concerns, let me know. I'd love to discuss them. Concern #1: "It would be rated R." This is the single most frequent concern I hear. I even heard this from someone who played in the Bible videos. To be fair, it's a legitimate concern. There are plenty of lots of R-rated ancient war movies - from Gladiator  (2000), to 300  (2006) to the extended edition of The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies  (2014/2015). Th...

Age of Ultron as a Hawkeye Movie

We sometimes say that Tony is the ultimate antagonist of the MCU. We sometimes say that Avengers: Age of Ultron is a movie more about Hawkeye than any other character. But it turns out: You could rewrite Age of Ultron in a way that takes out Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat and you would have effectively the same movie. The plot of Avengers: Age of Ultron  is pretty simple: When Tony Stark gets manipulated into creating a robot to protect the planet that goes awry, the rest of the Avengers try to stop the robot from destroying the earth. Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat don't actually help  Ultron or the Avengers to succeed in their goals. So let's re-imagine Age of Ultron  as a solo Hawkeye movie. In this version, Hawkeye becomes the main character, and b ecause of their traumatic experiences involving Stark, Wanda and Lame Quicksilver are still villains. Tony is rewritten as an obvious villain, giving us 4 major villains:  Tony, Wanda, Lame Quicksilver, and Ultron, ...

Chloe Bennet? Please?

Every time I see anything about Avengers: Infinity War , I feel bogged down, even though I should be really excited for it. I finally realized the reason: No Chloe Bennet. At this point, all I care about with the MCU is what the official title of Spider-Man: The Winter Formal will be (because what else do you call the sequel to Homecoming ?), what new genres they'll explore, and how they'll have the TV shows will affect the movies. Chloe Bennet's character from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. would be a fantastic addition to Avengers: Infinity  War . Her character is powerful enough to be helpful to the team, is from a show people already like, and is extremely easy to introduce to an audience that has never seen Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D . I would love to see Chloe Bennet in a Marvel movie. (The fact that she's extremely attractive doesn't hurt.)