Skip to main content

Why We Expect Connections in Star Wars [SPOILER FREE]

When I walked out of the theater for Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, I didn't wonder who Rey's parents were.
Maybe I should have. After all, J.J. Abrams directed it, and he loves to include mystery in his movies and TV shows.
When I walked out of the theater for Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, I didn't wonder who Snoke was.
Maybe I should have, but I assumed he was just a Big Bad behind the Big Bad. I didn't care whether he was a resurrected Palpatine, or an evil version of Yoda, or Darth Plagueis (which I just found out is spelled exactly the opposite of how I thought).
I didn't wonder whether Finn was the son of Lando Calrissian, or whether Poe was related to Boba Fett, or anything like that. I actually thought it was pretty cool that the villain was related to Han Solo!
Then I heard that people were wondering "Who are Rey's parents?" and "Who is Snoke?" and I thought "People are wondering this?"
Now people are saying that people shouldn't be disappointed in the new movies for having characters who aren't related to the old movies and who don't have backstories. After all, we didn't know the backstoreis of the characters in IV, V, and VI, and we were onboard with all of those. So why not treat Episodes VII, VIII, and IX like IV, V, and VI?
Because Star Wars has set an expectation for its audience that characters will be tied in to other characters.

Ep IV: The droids who need to find Obi-wan are owned by someone who knows Obi-wan. And Obi-wan happens to know the beautiful princess.

Ep V: Darth Vader is the father of the random farmboy who happens to be the protagonist.
Ep VI: The beautiful princess the farmboy is rescuing happens to be the sister of the farmboy and happens to be the daughter of the villain.
Ep I: The droids who become important later were created by the future villain.
Ep II: The Chancellor happens to be the future Big Bad. Not to mention Jango Fett.

And then there's Rogue One - where half the movie is connections to future movies.
These aren't just convenient coincidences. These are connections between characters that we've come to expect after 5 or 6 movies. If there were any other franchise with 5 movies in a row that all had 
After all that, we kind of expect mysterious characters to be connected to the old characters.

As a side-note, the reason I didn't wonder who Rey's parents were was because Rey acted towards Han and Leia as she would towards her parents, so I felt like there was emotional closure to the question of who Rey's parents were. I'm not the kind of person who has some fan theory that Rey is a Solo. I just assumed she was a Solo and didn't question who her parents were past there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I Don't Want The Current X-Men Multiverse To Fit In The MCU

Why don't I want the current X-Men multiverse in the MCU? I don't want the X-Men of the current X-Men multiverse to be fit into the MCU. The MCU has had seamless continuity the whole time (except for that one time). The X-Men multiverse has had such bad continuity that they created an entire movie to fix the continuity, and they STILL managed to throw in more continuity snags. The MCU has had more good films than bad films. The X-Men multiverse has had more bad films than good films. Avengers: Infinity War already has too many characters. X-Men: The Last Stand had too many characters. An Avengers/X-Men crossover is just BEGGING to have no emphasis on any given character. And frankly, I'm ready for the X-Men movies to be done. X-Men: Days of Future Past - The Rogue Cut  was both an excellent movie and an excellent resolution to the series. I'm emotionally resolved enough that I want the series to be done there. Not because the series is bad - but because The Rogue Cu...

How to Make a Good Mormon Movie

Have you ever seen a movie made by a Mormon and thought "I'm glad that movie was so clean and inspirational. It's a refreshing change of pace from Hollywood". Have you ever got home from that movie and realized "Wait a minute. The only thing that movie had going for it was that it was clean and inspirational. I guess that's all I was looking for, but if it were a normal Hollywood movie I forked out $10 to see, I would have thought it was awful." That's the case with basically every Mormon movie I watch. It's clean and inspirational, but it's really missing the quality I expect out of a normal movie. In my experience, Mormon movies are generally worse movies than movies made by someone who isn't Mormon. Now,  I'm not talking about a clean movie, or an entertaining movie, or an uplifting movie. I'm talking about a movie that uses the tools of storytelling and the tools of filmmaking to present a good story, well told. I'm talk...

Of Course They're Similar Plots - You Were Too Vague!

When you're describing the similarity between two plots, the more general you are, the less credible you are. Here's a general sketch of the worst versions of "every story is the same" or "these two stories are remarkably similar": "A character who is uncomfortable with his/her life is has a situation that forces him/her to reluctantly go on an adventure (possibly involving 1-2 companions who are total opposites of him/her) in order to get something (s)he really wants. Along  the way, (s)he encounters a lot of obstacles, has conflict with other characters, gets taken to his/her lowest point, and changes as a person. He/She finally gets the opportunity to return to his/her old life and either chooses to refuse it and continue in his/her new life or go back to his old life as a changed character." It technically describe virtually every plotline, but it's so vague that it shouldn't make anyone surprised about how similar the plotlines are. No...