Skip to main content

Why We Expect Connections in Star Wars [SPOILER FREE]

When I walked out of the theater for Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, I didn't wonder who Rey's parents were.
Maybe I should have. After all, J.J. Abrams directed it, and he loves to include mystery in his movies and TV shows.
When I walked out of the theater for Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, I didn't wonder who Snoke was.
Maybe I should have, but I assumed he was just a Big Bad behind the Big Bad. I didn't care whether he was a resurrected Palpatine, or an evil version of Yoda, or Darth Plagueis (which I just found out is spelled exactly the opposite of how I thought).
I didn't wonder whether Finn was the son of Lando Calrissian, or whether Poe was related to Boba Fett, or anything like that. I actually thought it was pretty cool that the villain was related to Han Solo!
Then I heard that people were wondering "Who are Rey's parents?" and "Who is Snoke?" and I thought "People are wondering this?"
Now people are saying that people shouldn't be disappointed in the new movies for having characters who aren't related to the old movies and who don't have backstories. After all, we didn't know the backstoreis of the characters in IV, V, and VI, and we were onboard with all of those. So why not treat Episodes VII, VIII, and IX like IV, V, and VI?
Because Star Wars has set an expectation for its audience that characters will be tied in to other characters.

Ep IV: The droids who need to find Obi-wan are owned by someone who knows Obi-wan. And Obi-wan happens to know the beautiful princess.

Ep V: Darth Vader is the father of the random farmboy who happens to be the protagonist.
Ep VI: The beautiful princess the farmboy is rescuing happens to be the sister of the farmboy and happens to be the daughter of the villain.
Ep I: The droids who become important later were created by the future villain.
Ep II: The Chancellor happens to be the future Big Bad. Not to mention Jango Fett.

And then there's Rogue One - where half the movie is connections to future movies.
These aren't just convenient coincidences. These are connections between characters that we've come to expect after 5 or 6 movies. If there were any other franchise with 5 movies in a row that all had 
After all that, we kind of expect mysterious characters to be connected to the old characters.

As a side-note, the reason I didn't wonder who Rey's parents were was because Rey acted towards Han and Leia as she would towards her parents, so I felt like there was emotional closure to the question of who Rey's parents were. I'm not the kind of person who has some fan theory that Rey is a Solo. I just assumed she was a Solo and didn't question who her parents were past there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should The Book of Mormon Be A Movie?

Over the last few years, my brother and I have been brainstorming about how to make an epic movie (or series of movies) out of The Book of Mormon. We didn't want something simple. We want something epic - a grand adventure for the ages, like we sometimes say the Book of Mormon itself is. I've heard a lot of people love the idea, and I've heard a lot of concerns. I'd like to address some of the concerns and see if I can help. Perhaps you could help me address my major concern with making the Book of Mormon into a movie. If you have any more concerns, let me know. I'd love to discuss them. Concern #1: "It would be rated R." This is the single most frequent concern I hear. I even heard this from someone who played in the Bible videos. To be fair, it's a legitimate concern. There are plenty of lots of R-rated ancient war movies - from Gladiator  (2000), to 300  (2006) to the extended edition of The Hobbit: Battle of the Five Armies  (2014/2015). Th...

Age of Ultron as a Hawkeye Movie

We sometimes say that Tony is the ultimate antagonist of the MCU. We sometimes say that Avengers: Age of Ultron is a movie more about Hawkeye than any other character. But it turns out: You could rewrite Age of Ultron in a way that takes out Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat and you would have effectively the same movie. The plot of Avengers: Age of Ultron  is pretty simple: When Tony Stark gets manipulated into creating a robot to protect the planet that goes awry, the rest of the Avengers try to stop the robot from destroying the earth. Cap, Thor, Hulk, and Nat don't actually help  Ultron or the Avengers to succeed in their goals. So let's re-imagine Age of Ultron  as a solo Hawkeye movie. In this version, Hawkeye becomes the main character, and b ecause of their traumatic experiences involving Stark, Wanda and Lame Quicksilver are still villains. Tony is rewritten as an obvious villain, giving us 4 major villains:  Tony, Wanda, Lame Quicksilver, and Ultron, ...

Chloe Bennet? Please?

Every time I see anything about Avengers: Infinity War , I feel bogged down, even though I should be really excited for it. I finally realized the reason: No Chloe Bennet. At this point, all I care about with the MCU is what the official title of Spider-Man: The Winter Formal will be (because what else do you call the sequel to Homecoming ?), what new genres they'll explore, and how they'll have the TV shows will affect the movies. Chloe Bennet's character from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. would be a fantastic addition to Avengers: Infinity  War . Her character is powerful enough to be helpful to the team, is from a show people already like, and is extremely easy to introduce to an audience that has never seen Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D . I would love to see Chloe Bennet in a Marvel movie. (The fact that she's extremely attractive doesn't hurt.)